USA v. Shannon et al
| USA |
| Christopher W. Shannon, Amy Lynn Shannon and City of Marshall, Illinois |
| 3:2023cv00173 |
| January 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Amy Lynn Shannon. Original forwarded to USMS per request of AUSA. (bmc)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by USA. Christopher W. Shannon waiver sent on 1/20/2023, answer due 3/21/2023. (Hanna, Adam)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by USA. City of Marshall, Illinois waiver sent on 1/20/2023, answer due 3/21/2023. (Hanna, Adam)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-00173-DWD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (bmc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Adam E. Hanna on behalf of USA (Hanna, Adam)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF FORECLOSURE by USA (Hanna, Adam)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against City of Marshall, Illinois, Amy L. Shannon, Christopher W. Shannon, filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through D, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hanna, Adam)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
