Larkin v. Walmart, Inc.
| Junee Larkin |
| Walmart, Inc. and Walmart, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club |
| 3:2023cv00589 |
| February 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #19 MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Complaint, #21 MOTION to Remand filed by All Plaintiffs. (Hipskind, John) |
Filing 23
ORDER: The Scheduling and Discovery Conference set for 4/13/2023 is CANCELLED and RESET for 5/15/2023 at 11:30 AM via telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. To join the conference call, the parties should call 888-273-3658. The access code is 1770924. The security code is 5890. The parties are reminded that they are to submit a Joint Report and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order seven days before the conference via e-mail to RJDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff is also ORDERED to e-mail a copy of her proposed amended complaint to RJDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 4/11/2023. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #21 MOTION to Remand filed by Walmart, Inc.. (DeFranco, James) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Remand by Junee Larkin. (Hipskind, John) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #19 Motion to Amend/Correct filed by Junee Larkin. Proposed Amended Complaint was attached to the main document. Proposed documents are not to be filed, but rather submitted via e-mail to the Court (see CM/ECF Users Manual at pgs. 2.6-2.7). Proposed Amended Complaint to be deleted in accordance with this Courts practices. Proposed documents need to be e-mailed to the proper judge. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Amend/Correct Plaintiff's Complaint by Junee Larkin. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Hipskind, John) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/9/2023. (jlm)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Scheduling and Discovery Conference set for 4/13/2023 at 10:00 AM via telephone before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. To join the conference call, the parties should call 888-273-3658. The access code is 1770924. The security code is 5890. The parties are to submit a Joint Report and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order seven days before the conference via e-mail to RJDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 3/9/2023. (jlm)
|
| Filing 16 CJRA TRACK B assigned. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/14/2024 at 9:30 AM in Benton Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. Jury Trial set for 3/26/2024 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly.(jlm) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Hipskind, John) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 23-589-RJD. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (csb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 13 NOTICE REGARDING FILING re #12 Notice (Other) filed by Junee Larkin. Incorrect event selected. Select the event that most closely matches the document being filed. For this document, the correct event is "Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. This Notice is sent for informational purposes only. (csb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 12 FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Hipskind, John) Modified on 3/8/2023 (csb). |
| Filing 11 NOTICE to Junee Larkin STRIKING #8 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge: The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. It fails to list the party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Another form is attached to this Notice. The form should be re-filed as soon as possible. The form should specifically list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Please note that, pursuant to the Courts prior Order, the deadline for submitting this form is 3/14/2023.(csb) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (DeFranco, James) |
| Filing 9 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Junee Larkin. (Hipskind, John) |
| Filing 8 STRICKEN CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Hipskind, John) Modified on 3/6/2023 (csb). |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John T. Hipskind on behalf of Junee Larkin (Hipskind, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Orders 257 and 341. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 257 and 341, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Junee Larkin, Walmart, Inc.. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-cv-589-RJD. Consent due by 3/14/2023 (csb) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Walmart, Inc..(DeFranco, James) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Walmart, Inc.. (DeFranco, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James E. DeFranco on behalf of Walmart, Inc. (DeFranco, James) |
| Filing 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Walmart, Inc.. (DeFranco, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County, case number 23-LA-69 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5005438), filed by Walmart, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit Notice of Filing, St. Clair County)(DeFranco, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
