Anderson et al v. Raoul et al
| Carlin Anderson and Dave Clark |
| Kwame Raoul, Brendan F. Kelly, Craig Miller and Bryan Robbins |
| 3:2023cv00728 |
| February 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 29 MOTION to Withdraw #28 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by All Defendants. (Dworkin, Hal) |
| Filing 28 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Unopposed) by All Defendants. (Dworkin, Hal) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Appearance by Hal Dworkin on behalf of All Defendants (Dworkin, Hal) |
Filing 26
ORDER STAYING CASE: This case was filed on February 27, 2023. On February 24, 2023, this Court consolidated four cases that addressed the Protect Illinois Communities Act a/k/a Public Act 102-1116 a/k/a 720 ILCS 5/24-1.9, to wit: 23-cv-141-SPM, 23-cv-192-SPM, 23-cv-209-SPM, and 23-cv-215-SPM. At that time, the Court also entered a briefing schedule and set oral argument on the pending Motions for Preliminary Injunction. Of note, there is neither a pending motion for preliminary injunction nor have the parties sought to consolidate this matter with the pending cases. Nevertheless, this Court has "broad discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its own docket." See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997). The Court FINDS that the pending motions in lead case 23-cv-209-SPM could have a significant effect on this matter and does not wish to delay proceedings therein. Accordingly, the Court concludes that a stay of these proceedings is proper. This matter is hereby STAYED for 90 days. All pending matters are held in abeyance. The parties shall file a joint status report on or before July 1, 2023<. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 4/5/2023. (jce) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #20 Return of Service Executed filed by Dave Clark, Carlin Anderson. Document filed incorrectly and re-filed the correct way at doc #24 . No further action required by the filer. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 24 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Kwame Raoul served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Bryan Robbins served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 22 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Craig Miller served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. Brendan F. Kelly served on 3/16/2023, answer due 4/6/2023. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 20 STRICKEN RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED by All Plaintiffs on 03/16/23. (Sigale, David) Modified on 3/24/2023 (kdw). |
| Filing 19 Summonses Issued as to Brendan F. Kelly, Craig Miller, Kwame Raoul, Bryan Robbins, and originals mailed to Attorney Sigale. (kdw) |
| Filing 18 Summons Requested. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 17 Summons Requested. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 16 Summons Requested. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 15 Summons Requested. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Athanasia Livas on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Livas, Athanasia) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter A. Patterson on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Patterson, Peter) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by David H. Thompson on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Thompson, David) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #6 , #7 , and #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorneys David H. Thompson, Peter A. Patterson, and Athanasia Livas on behalf of all Plaintiffs. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 10 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by All Plaintiffs. (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David G. Sigale on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Sigale, David) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Athanasia Livas $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5018199 by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Livas, Athanasia) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Peter A. Patterson $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5018191 by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Patterson, Peter) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Receipt No. AILSDC-5018172 by Attorney David H. Thompson by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Thompson, David) |
| Filing 5 Case Reassigned to Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to the case. (kdw) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #2 Notice of Initial Magistrate Assignment,,,,,, filed by Dave Clark, Carlin Anderson. Docket clerk error. Document to be reassigned to Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ACTION re #1 Complaint, filed by Dave Clark, Carlin Anderson. The Notice of Appearance filed, and Disclosure statement need to be filed as separate docket entries. Please re-file the notice of appearance under the event Civil-> Notices-> Notice of Appearance. For the Disclosure statement re-file under Civil-> Other Filings->Other Documents. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 2 STRICKEN NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Orders 257 and 341. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 257 and 341, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Carlin Anderson, Dave Clark. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-728-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 3/21/2023 (kdw) Modified on 2/28/2023 (kdw). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5012642.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appearance (Sigale), #3 F.R. Civ. P. 7.1 Disclosure Statement)(Sigale, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
