Spruell v. Huron Legal Group, PLLC et al
| Lawrence S. Spruell |
| Huron Legal Group, PLLC and Better Life Plans, LLC |
| 3:2023cv00933 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE. Approved by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 5/9/2023. (jlm) |
Filing 7
ORDER: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that Plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss this case without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before Defendants either answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Dismissal (Doc. 6) and informs the Court that the parties settled (Doc. 5). Because Defendants neither answered nor moved for summary judgment, Plaintiff's notice does not require judicial approval. This matter is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 5/9/2023. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Lawrence S. Spruell (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Settlement by Lawrence S. Spruell (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Better Life Plans, LLC, Huron Legal Group, PLLC. Originals mailed to Attorney Volheim. (bmc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Orders 257 and 341. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 257 and 341, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Lawrence S. Spruell. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-00933-RJD. Consent due by 4/12/2023 (bmc) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim on behalf of Lawrence S. Spruell (Volheim, Nathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Better Life Plans, LLC, Huron Legal Group, PLLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5031221.), filed by Lawrence S. Spruell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Volheim, Nathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
