Ambrosio v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Marie Ambrosio |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2023cv01094 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Megan C. Hugo on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Hugo, Megan)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. A federal court is authorized under 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(1) to permit an indigent party to proceed in a civil action without prepaying the filing fee if the party "submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets [he] possesses [showing] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." The Court is satisfied from Plaintiff's affidavit that she is indigent. Therefore, the Court GRANTS the motion to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees and costs. The Court notes, however, that should it become apparent that the action is frivolous or malicious at any time in the future, it may dismiss the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 5/4/2023. (klh2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-CV-1094-MAB. (clw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 8
FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Gaines, Brent) Modified on 4/21/2023 (clw).
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wyatt, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wyatt, Nathan)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing All Parties to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 257 and 341, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to All Parties on 3/31/2023. Consent due by 4/21/2023 (clw)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice of Commencement of Action and Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. An electronic copy of the Complaint is attached. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-CV-1094-MAB. (clw)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Brent M. Gaines on behalf of Marie Ambrosio (Gaines, Brent)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marie Ambrosio. (Gaines, Brent)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Marie Ambrosio. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gaines, Brent)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
