Mayor v. Tharp et al
Richard D Mayor |
Chris Tharp, Captain Riding, Kyle Napp and T. Luke Yager |
3:2023cv01347 |
April 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
David W Dugan |
J Phil Gilbert |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set/Reset Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/30/2023. (kare) |
|
|
|
Filing 4 NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 5/23/2023 (kare) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 4/25/2023. Consent due by 5/16/2023 (jaj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Richard D Mayor.(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.