Laws v. Wal-Mart
| Tyshon D. Laws |
| Wal-Mart |
| 3:2023cv01926 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER: #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer is GRANTED. Defendant has until 8/21/2023 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #3 Complaint. Defendant has waived service. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 7/11/2023. (bceb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Waive Service by Wal-Mart. (Lopez, Abad) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Abad Lopez on behalf of Wal-Mart (Lopez, Abad) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, this case will remain with the assigned District Judge Stephen P. McGlynn. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (jlh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (adh) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 6/7/2023. (bceb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyshon D. Laws. (clw) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Wal-Mart, filed by Tyshon D. Laws. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(clw) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Tyshon Laws to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Tyshon Laws on 6/5/2023. Consent due by 6/26/2023 (clw) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Stephen P. McGlynn assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-CV-1926-SPM. Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Laws v. Wal-Mart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tyshon D. Laws | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wal-Mart | |
| Represented By: | Abad Lopez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
