Hall v. DG Retail, LLC
| Charity Hall |
| DG Retail, LLC doing business as Dollar General |
| 3:2023cv02392 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 1 U.S.C. ยง 102 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 23-cv-02392-MAB. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (jlh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #10 Agreed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings. Plaintiff shall submit her individual claims to arbitration. As a result, the matter is STAYED and the parties shall jointly inform the Court when arbitration is completed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 8/3/2023. (scm)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Eisenback, Chad) Modified on 8/3/2023 (jlh). |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Compel [Agreed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings] by DG Retail, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arbitration Agreement)(Lennox, Katharine) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Lennox, Katharine) |
| Filing 8 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by DG Retail, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Dollar General Corporation, Other Affiliate Dolgencorp of Texas, Inc., Other Affiliate DG Strategic I, LLC, Other Affiliate DG Promotions, Inc. for DG Retail, LLC. (Lennox, Katharine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Katharine P Lennox on behalf of DG Retail, LLC (Lennox, Katharine) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charity Hall. DG Retail, LLC served on 7/14/2023, answer due 8/4/2023. (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DG Retail, LLC. Original summons mailed to Attorney Badwan. (lmb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order 347. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 347, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Charity Hall. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-2392-MAB. Consent due by 8/2/2023 (lmb) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad William Eisenback on behalf of Charity Hall (Eisenback, Chad) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mohammed O. Badwan on behalf of Charity Hall (Badwan, Mohammed) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DG Retail, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5131601.), filed by Charity Hall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B)(Badwan, Mohammed) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. DG Retail, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charity Hall | |
| Represented By: | Chad William Eisenback |
| Represented By: | Mohammed O. Badwan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DG Retail, LLC doing business as Dollar General | |
| Represented By: | Katharine P Lennox |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
