Whitten v. Commissioner of Social Security
Ryniah Whitten |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSAOGC |
3:2023cv02402 |
July 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Social Security: HIA |
42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Approved by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 9/5/2023. (mlp) |
|
|
Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wyatt, Nathan) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wyatt, Nathan) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ryniah Whitten. (csb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Ryniah Whitten.(csb) |
Filing 1 Notice of Commencement of Action and Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. An electronic copy of the Complaint is attached. All future documents must bear case number 23-cv-2402-NJR. This notice suffices for service under Supplemental Rule 3 as it provides a means of electronic access to the complaint to the SSAOGC and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (csb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.