Lee v. Social Security
| Arlene Lee |
| Commissioner Social Security and Kilolo Kijakozi |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2023cv02415 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE AND ORDER: In accordance with Local Rule, plaintiff's brief is due "within 30 days after the filing of the answer and transcript". (SDIL-LR 9.1(b)(5). Because the due date falls on the weekend, plaintiff shall file her brief on or before October 2, 2023 and defendant's brief shall be due 3o days thereafter. (Action due by 10/2/2023.) Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 9/5/2023. (jce) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Defendant's brief due within 30 days after filing of plaintiff's brief. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 9/1/2023. (jle)
|
| Filing 11 SUBMISSION OF TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record. filed by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Kilolo Kijakozi. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records)(Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE - All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Nonetheless, to maintain an equalized docket and to foster efficiency, this action will not be referred to a magistrate judge at this time. See Administrative Order No. 347. Accordingly, until further notice, this case will remain with the assigned district judge. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Goetz, David) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Kilolo Kijakozi (Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Charles Yarnell on behalf of Kilolo Kijakozi (Yarnell, Eric) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Stephen P. McGlynn on 7/17/2023. (jce)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Commencement of Action and Judge Assignment. Judge Stephen P. McGlynn assigned. An electronic copy of the Complaint is attached. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-02415-SPM. This notice suffices for service under Supplemental Rule 3 as it provides a means of electronic access to the complaint to the SSAOGC and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (aza) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by David B Goetz on behalf of Arlene Lee (Goetz, David) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Arlene Lee. (Goetz, David) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security, filed by Arlene Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goetz, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
