Due v. Ahmed et al
Plaintiff: Randall David Due
Defendant: Faisal Vakil Ahmed, Mary A Noland, Syed Fateh Hyder, K. Schneider and John and /or Jane Does
Case Number: 3:2023cv02431
Filed: July 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2023 Filing 16 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj)
August 21, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
August 21, 2023 Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj)
August 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Consistent with Administrative Order No. 257, Due was previously directed to file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. The time for doing so has long passed, and in spite of a warning and additional time to do so, said party continues to ignore the Court's directive by not returning the form. Thus, Due is ordered to SHOW CAUSE why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to file the attached form as is required under Administrative Order No. 257. Show Cause Response re Consent due by 8/31/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/17/2023. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
August 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING in part #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend filed by Randall David Due. Amended Pleadings due by 9/13/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 8/11/2023. (anp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
August 10, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Randall David Due. (jaj)
August 3, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 8/10/2023 (jaj)
July 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING without prejudice #1 Complaint filed by Randall David Due, DENYING #3 Motion to Proceed IFP filed by Randall David Due. Due may file an Amended Complaint and renew his motion to proceed IFP. Amended Pleadings due by 8/14/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/17/2023. (anp)
July 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 This Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee from the Middle District of Georgia, previously assigned case number: 22-217. Your new case number is 23-2431-NJR. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within seven days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 7/13/2023. (jaj)
July 13, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 7/13/2023. Consent due by 8/3/2023 (jaj)
July 13, 2023 Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 1:22-cv-00217. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
July 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE LESLIE ABRAMS GARDNER on 7/13/2023. (bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
July 13, 2023 Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Southern District of Illinois. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 7/27/2023. (bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
March 3, 2023 US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF no longer assigned to case. (mdm) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
December 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
December 30, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
December 30, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION to Change Venue Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
December 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 BOP Letter, #3 Exhibit D - General Surgery History and Physical, #4 Exhibit E - Authorization for Release of Medical Information, #5 Exhibit F - Clinical Encounter, #6 Exhibit G - BOP Letter re Claim, #7 Exhibit H - Documentation of Informal Resolution Attempt, #8 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]
December 30, 2022 US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF added.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Due v. Ahmed et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randall David Due
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Faisal Vakil Ahmed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary A Noland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Syed Fateh Hyder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and /or Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?