Due v. Ahmed et al
Randall David Due |
Faisal Vakil Ahmed, Mary A Noland, Syed Fateh Hyder, K. Schneider and John and /or Jane Does |
3:2023cv02431 |
July 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Prison Condition |
28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, this case will remain with the assigned Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (jaj)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
|
|
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Randall David Due. (jaj) |
Filing 10 NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 257, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 8/10/2023 (jaj) |
|
|
Filing 7 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 7/13/2023. Consent due by 8/3/2023 (jaj) |
Filing 6 Case transferred in from District of Georgia Middle; Case Number 1:22-cv-00217. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Southern District of Illinois. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 7/27/2023. (bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.] |
US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF no longer assigned to case. (mdm) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.] |
|
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.] |
Filing 2 MOTION to Change Venue Filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by RANDALL DAVID DUE (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 BOP Letter, #3 Exhibit D - General Surgery History and Physical, #4 Exhibit E - Authorization for Release of Medical Information, #5 Exhibit F - Clinical Encounter, #6 Exhibit G - BOP Letter re Claim, #7 Exhibit H - Documentation of Informal Resolution Attempt, #8 Envelope)(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.] |
US MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF added.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(bcl) [Transferred from Georgia Middle on 7/13/2023.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.