Bush v. Dobbs et al
Keelan R Bush |
Tasha Dobbs, P Martin, Dietary Supervisor Hill and Dr Babish |
3:2023cv02975 |
August 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 16.06 received, receipt number 5383 (clw) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION to Substitute Party (Correction Statement) by Keelan R Bush. (jaj) |
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT by Keelan R Bush to #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (jaj) |
Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jaj) |
![]() |
Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 257, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 8/31/2023. Consent due by 9/21/2023 (jaj) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Keelan R Bush. (jaj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Keelan R Bush.(jaj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.