Hartman et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Plaintiff: Rebecca Hartman, Joseph Turner, R.H. and E.T.
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv02995
Filed: August 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: Reona J Daly
Referring Judge: Nancy J Rosenstengel
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Filing 23 MOTION to Dismiss / DEFENDANT META PLATFORMS, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit - Declaration of Lauren R. Goldman, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Privacy Notice, #4 Exhibit C - Privacy Notice, #5 Exhibit D - Terms of Service, #6 Exhibit E - Terms of Service, #7 Exhibit F - Privacy Policy, #8 Exhibit G - Sign-up Webpage, #9 Exhibit H - Sign-up Webpage, #10 Exhibit I - Messenger Application, #11 Exhibit J - Privacy Protection Rule, #12 Exhibit K - Help Center Article)(Goldman, Lauren)
October 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING #19 Joint Motion to Set Briefing Schedule and Adjust Page Limitation. Defendant Meta's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by November 7, 2023, and shall not exceed 25 pages. Plaintiffs' response to Defendant Meta's Motion to Dismiss shall be filed by January 8, 2024, and shall not exceed 25 pages. Defendant Meta's reply to Plaintiff's response, if any, shall be filed by February 2, 2024, and shall not exceed 5 pages. (Motion to Dismiss due by 11/7/2023, Responses due by 1/8/2024, Replies due by 2/2/2024). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/27/2023. (lrs) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER granting #20 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Seton Hartnett on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 26, 2023 Filing 20 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Seton Hartnett $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5219510 by on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Hartnett, Seton)
October 26, 2023 Filing 19 Joint MOTION to Set Briefing Schedule and Adjust Page Limitation by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Provance, Matt)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER GRANTING #17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response by Meta Platforms, Inc. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint on or before November 7, 2023. (Answer due 11/7/2023). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 10/13/2023. (lrs) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 12, 2023 Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, (Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint) by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Provance, Matt)
September 25, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-02995-NJR. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 22, 2023 Filing 15 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Provance, Matt)
September 22, 2023 Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Keane, Ryan)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Michael Brandon on behalf of Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Lefteri J. Christos on behalf of Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Lauren R. Goldman on behalf of Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 6, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Michael Brandon $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5180361 by on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Brandon, Michael)
September 6, 2023 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Lefteri J. Christos $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5180360 by on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Christos, Lefteri)
September 6, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Lauren R. Goldman $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5180359 by on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Goldman, Lauren)
September 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 (Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint) filed by Meta Platforms, Inc. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 10/23/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 9/6/2023. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
September 5, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, (Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint) by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Provance, Matt)
September 5, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matt Provance on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (Provance, Matt)
September 1, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order 347. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 347, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-2995-RJD. Consent due by 9/22/2023 (kdw)
August 31, 2023 Filing 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Fenske, Daniel)
August 31, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Thomas Fenske on behalf of Meta Platforms, Inc. (Fenske, Daniel)
August 31, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Illinois Circuit Court, St. Clair County, case number 23-LA-0787 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5176659), filed by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit 3 - Civil Cover Sheet)(Fenske, Daniel)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hartman et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Hartman
Represented By: Ryan A. Keane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Turner
Represented By: Ryan A. Keane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R.H.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: E.T.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc.
Represented By: Daniel Thomas Fenske
Represented By: Lauren R. Goldman
Represented By: Lefteri J. Christos
Represented By: Matt Provance
Represented By: Michael Brandon
Represented By: Seton Hartnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?