Perez et al v. Mayorkas et al
Lacey Dawn Perez and Rosendo Perez Perez |
Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Director of Nebraska Service Center, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Director Terri Robinson, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick B. Garland, Terri Robinson and Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
3:2023cv03068 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Staci M Yandle |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Screenshot of date delivered)(Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 14 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #12 Summons Returned Executed #11 Summons Returned Executed as to USA, #13 Summons Returned Executed filed by Rosendo Perez Perez, Lacey Dawn Perez. Select the event which most closely matches the document being filed. For this document, the correct event is "Summons Returned Executed. E-filer is instructed to re-file using Civil>Service of Process> Summons Returned Executed in order to properly trigger the answer due deadline. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 13 STRICKEN SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Movassaghi, Saman) Modified on 10/19/2023 (kdw). |
Filing 12 STRICKEN SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Movassaghi, Saman) Modified on 10/19/2023 (kdw). |
Filing 11 STRICKEN SUMMONS Returned Executed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Screenshot of date delivered)(Movassaghi, Saman) Modified on 10/19/2023 (kdw). |
Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. Original mailed to Attorney Movassaghi. (jle) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 23-3068-SMY. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Saman Movassaghi on behalf of Rosendo Perez Perez and Lacey Dawn Perez.(jlh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Saman Movassaghi on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Saman Movassaghi $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5184759 by on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Movassaghi, Saman) |
Filing 4 Summonses Issued as to Director of Nebraska Service Center, Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Terri Robinson and originals mailed to Attorney Movassaghi. (kdw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ACTION re #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Rosendo Perez Perez, Lacey Dawn Perez. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Movassaghi does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order 347. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 347, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Lacey Dawn Perez, Rosendo Perez Perez. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-3068-MAB. Consent due by 10/3/2023 (kdw) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5183693.), filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(Movassaghi, Saman) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.