Day v. Whitmore et al
| Joseph Day |
| Rufus D. Whitmore, WE RUN IT LLC, Mary Mitchem and Mary J Mitchem |
| 3:2023cv03077 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Stephen Saracino on behalf of Joseph Day (Saracino, Christopher) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION: Attorney Saracino listed twice as counsel for Plaintiff. Profile for Christopher Stephen Saracino removed. No further action is required by the filer in relation to this notification. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF ACTION re #7 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge, #13 Motion for Issuance filed by Joseph Day. See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Saracino does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 14 Summons Issued as to Mary J Mitchem. Original mailed to counsel for service. (adh) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Issuance of Alias Summons to Mary Mitchem by Joseph Day. (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons to Mary Mitchem)(Saracino, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by We Run It LLC identifying Other Affiliate Shameka Wiley for We Run It LLC. (Shannon, Christopher) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by We Run It LLC.(Shannon, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-3077-SMY. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Shannon, Christopher) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Rufus D. Whitmore was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 347, Rufus D. Whitmore shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 10/12/2023 (adh) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Saracino, Christopher) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Rufus D. Whitmore.(Shannon, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 Letter to Attorney Saracino regarding admission to SDIL. (adh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Shannon on behalf of Rufus D. Whitmore (Shannon, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ACTION: See Local Rule 83.1(f). In all cases filed in, removed to, or transferred to this court, all attorneys, including government attorneys, shall file a written entry of appearance before addressing the court. Attorney Shannon does not have a Notice of Appearance on file in this case. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Order 347. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 347, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Rufus D. Whitmore. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-3077-GCS. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 10/4/2023 (adh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Clark County Illinois, case number 2023LA14 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5184757), filed by Rufus D. Whitmore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2-Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Shannon, Christopher) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
