Gutzler v. MRB Development, LLC
Plaintiff: Mary Gutzler
Defendant: MRB Development, LLC doing business as Copper Fire
Case Number: 3:2023cv03109
Filed: September 14, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: J Phil Gilbert
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 1 U.S.C. ยง 102 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER: The Joint Report of Parties is approved and entered. The Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for 10/22/2024 at 9:00 AM with a Jury Trial date of 11/4/2024 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert. Discovery due by 6/24/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 7/24/2024. Stipulation Selecting Mediator to be filed by 11/30/2023. Mandatory Mediation Session to be completed by 3/15/2024. Mandatory Mediation Program Completion due by 7/9/2024. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 11/8/2023. (Attachments: #1 Joint Report)(tag)
November 2, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #19 Status Report filed by Mary Gutzler. The Joint Report of Parties and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order shall not be filed on the docket, rather should be submitted to the assigned Judges proposed documents e-mail address. The subject line of the e- mail must include the case number and reference Joint Report. (csb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
November 1, 2023 Filing 19 STRICKEN STATUS REPORT by Mary Gutzler. (Eisenback, Chad) Modified on 11/2/2023 (csb).
October 25, 2023 Filing 18 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by MRB Development, LLC. (Schuver, Mark)
October 25, 2023 Filing 17 CJRA TRACK B assigned: The Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for 10/22/2024 at 9:00 AM with a Jury Trial date of 11/4/2024 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert. Parties are to submit a Joint Report regarding Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order within 28 days of the entry of this filing. Scheduling/Discovery and Settlement Conferences will NOT be set for hearing unless requested by the parties or deemed necessary by the Court. Joint Proposed Discovery due by 11/22/2023.(tag)
October 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MANDATORY MEDIATION REFERRAL ORDER. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 10/25/2023. (tag)
October 24, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge J. Phil Gilbert for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 23-cv-3109-JPG. (csb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 23, 2023 Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Schuver, Mark)
October 23, 2023 Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by MRB Development, LLC.(Schuver, Mark)
October 23, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark S. Schuver on behalf of MRB Development, LLC (Schuver, Mark)
October 11, 2023 Filing 11 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Eisenback, Chad)
October 11, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE: Mary Gutzler was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 347, Mary Gutzler shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 10/18/2023 (csb)
October 11, 2023 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Mary Gutzler. MRB Development, LLC served on 10/4/2023, answer due 10/25/2023. (Volheim, Nathan)
October 10, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #7 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. Document is incomplete, signature is required. Counsel to refile. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
October 6, 2023 Filing 7 STRICKEN CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Eisenback, Chad)
September 25, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to MRB Development, LLC. Original mailed to counsel for service. (csb)
September 21, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Requested. (Volheim, Nathan)
September 15, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Order 347. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 347, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Mary Gutzler. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-cv-3109-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 10/6/2023. (jle)
September 14, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad William Eisenback on behalf of Mary Gutzler (Eisenback, Chad)
September 14, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan C. Volheim on behalf of Mary Gutzler (Volheim, Nathan)
September 14, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MRB Development, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5187063.), filed by Mary Gutzler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Volheim, Nathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gutzler v. MRB Development, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Gutzler
Represented By: Chad William Eisenback
Represented By: Nathan C. Volheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MRB Development, LLC doing business as Copper Fire
Represented By: Mark S. Schuver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?