Robe Probe et al v. McGehee et al
| Robe Probe and John Doe |
| Tammy Renee Weikert, John Layne McGehee, Tammy Renee Wilson, Teresa A. Ricke, Jill Doe and Victoria Bluedorn |
| 3:2023cv03248 |
| October 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 8 sent to Robe Probe (aza) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 6 sent to Robe Probe (aza) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Document 5 sent to Robe Probe (aza) |
Filing 8
ORDER: On October 2, 2023, this case was opened without payment of the $402.00 filing fee or the filing of a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Within 30 days of the entry of this Order (on or before DEcember 1, 2023), Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit the $402.00 filing fee or a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. If Plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee or submit the motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee by the deadline, the case will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781 (7th Cir. 1998). (Action due by 12/1/2023). Signed by Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel on 11/1/2023. (tjk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (aza) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, this case will remain with the assigned Chief U.S. District Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (aza) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Robe Probe was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 347, Robe Probe shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 11/1/2023 (adh) |
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Documents 1 and 2 sent to Robe Probe (kare) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Robe Probe to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 347, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Robe Probe on 10/3/2023. Consent due by 10/24/2023 (clw) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs.(clw) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-CV-3248-NJR. Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (clw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
