Recer et al v. Agri Sompo North America, Inc. et al
| Suzanne Recer and Benjamin recer |
| AgriSomp North America, Inc., Jeffrey A Rayner and Agri Sompo North America, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv03815 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/9/2024. (jlm)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference. Scheduling and Discovery Conference set for 2/15/2024 at 10:00 AM via telephone before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. To join the conference call, the parties should call 888-273-3658. The access code is 1770924. The security code is 2011. The parties are to submit a Joint Report and Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order seven days before the conference via e-mail to RJDpd@ilsd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/9/2024. (jlm)
|
| Filing 15 CJRA TRACK B assigned. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/2/2025 at 9:30 AM in Benton Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly. Jury Trial set for 1/14/2025 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly.(jlm) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-03815-RJD. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 13 FINAL CONSENT - NOTICE by All Plaintiffs Suzanne Recer, et al. (Meehan, William) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE: Suzanna Recer and Benjamin Recer was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, Suzanna Recer and Benjamin Recer shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 1/2/2024 (aza) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Agri Sompo North America, Inc. Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction and Consent/Non-Consent Form (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney William K. Meehan on behalf of Benjamin Recer and Suzanne Recer. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney William K. Meehan by on behalf of Benjamin Recer, Suzanne Recer. (Meehan, William) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Jeffrey A Rayner.(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Agri Sompo North America, Inc..(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 6 Letter to Attorney William Meehan regarding admission to SDIL. (aza) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Orders 347 and 367. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-03815-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 12/22/2023 (aza) |
| Filing 4 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by All Defendants. (Klaus, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County Circuit Court, case number 23LA1201, filed by All Defendants.(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County Circuit Court, case number 23LA1201, filed by All Defendants.(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Clair County Circuit Court, case number 23LA1201 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5248346), filed by All Defendants.(Klaus, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
