Jenkins-Cotton v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Letitia Jenkins-Cotton |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2023cv03817 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| David W Dugan |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notice of Commencement of Action and Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. An electronic copy of the Complaint is attached. All future documents must bear case number 3:23-cv-3817-DWD. This notice suffices for service under Supplemental Rule 3 as it provides a means of electronic access to the complaint to the SSAOGC and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (adh) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Letitia Jenkins-Cotton. (Van Fossan, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Letitia Jenkins-Cotton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet civil cover sheet, #2 Supplement original filing form)(Van Fossan, Jennifer) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer M. Van Fossan on behalf of Letitia Jenkins-Cotton (Van Fossan, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
