Allsman v. Shell USA, Inc. et al
Edward Allsman |
3M Company, Shell USA, Inc., Phillips 66 Company, Aton, LLC, Safety Kleen Systems, Inc., Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, Tyco Fire Products, L.P., Chemguard, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., National Foam, Inc., HWRT Oil Company, Williams Fire & Hazard Control, Inc., Johnson Controls, Inc., Angus International Safety Group, Ltd., Angus Fire Armour Corporation, Carrier Global Corporation, United Technologies Corporation, Kidde PLC Inc., Kidde Fenwal Fire Fighting, Inc. and Olin Corporation |
3:2023cv03920 |
December 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Gilbert C Sison |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 Docket Annotation - Case transferred from Illinois Southern has been opened in District of South Carolina as case 2:24-cv-00211, filed 01/12/2024. (clw) |
Filing 39 Docket Annotation -per CTO 169, case electronically transferred to District of South Carolina. (jlrr) |
Filing 38 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO 169) in regards to MDL 2873, IN RE: AQUEOUS FILMFORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION as assigned by Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Panel and approved by Tiffaney D. Pete on 1/12/2024.(jlrr) |
Filing 37 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Champlin, Matthew) |
Filing 36 NOTICE by 3M Company re #1 Notice of Removal (Notice of Filing of Consents to Removal) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Rottenberg, Daniel) |
Filing 35 MOTION to Remand by Edward Allsman. (Edelson, Joshua) |
Filing 34 AMENDED COMPLAINT Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B) against All Defendants, filed by Edward Allsman.(Edelson, Joshua) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Appearance by Ted N. Gianaris on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Gianaris, Ted) |
Filing 32 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Gianaris, Ted) |
Filing 31 NOTICE: Edward Allsman was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, Edward Allsman shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 1/11/2024. In addition, if Attorneys Edelson and Gianaris would like to remain on this case, they need to file an appearance.(jle) |
Filing 30 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Rottenberg, Daniel) |
Filing 29 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court GRANTS the extension of time and allows Defendant 3M to respond to the complaint 28 days after the MDL issues its order regarding the transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison on 1/3/2024. (kbh) THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 28 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Bryant, J.) |
Filing 27 CONSENT to Removal bySafety Kleen Systems, Inc.. (Bryant, J.) |
Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Phillip Bryant on behalf of Safety Kleen Systems, Inc. (Bryant, J.) |
Filing 25 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing HWRT Oil Company and Phillips 66 Company to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to HWRT Oil Company and Phillips 66 Company on 01/03/2024. Consent due by 1/24/2024. (jle) |
Filing 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Phillips 66 Company. (Bauer, Beth) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM in Support re #22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Phillips 66 Company. (Bauer, Beth) |
Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) by Phillips 66 Company. (Bauer, Beth) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Beth A. Bauer on behalf of Phillips 66 Company (Bauer, Beth) |
Filing 20 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by HWRT Oil Company. (Champlin, Matthew) |
Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Memorandum in Support by HWRT Oil Company. (Champlin, Matthew) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew B. Champlin on behalf of HWRT Oil Company (Champlin, Matthew) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading (Agreed) by 3M Company. (Rottenberg, Daniel) |
Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Shell USA, Inc.. (Kinney, Gregg) |
Filing 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Shell USA, Inc.. (Kinney, Gregg) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Gregg A. Kinney on behalf of Shell USA, Inc. (Kinney, Gregg) |
Filing 13 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #6 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement filed by Shell USA, Inc.. Login information used and signature on document do not match. Document shall be re-filed using the appropriate credentials. (jle)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 12 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking 10 Notice Striking Electronically Filed Documents,. Clerk Error- Wrong Document Stricken. (jle)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 11 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Shell USA, Inc.. There cannot be two Attorney signatures on 1 entry of appearance. (jle)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 10 STRICKEN- NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Shell USA, Inc. Login information used and signature on document do not match. Document shall be re-filed using the appropriate credentials. (jle)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. Modified on 12/26/2023 (jle). |
Filing 9 NOTICE REGARDING FILING re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Shell USA, Inc . When pleadings contain multiple attorney signatures, the non-filing attorney must include the language with consent with his/her signature. See Section 2.1 of the CM/ECF Users Manual. This notice is for informational purposes and therefore no action is required. (jle)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. Modified on 12/26/2023 (jle). |
Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Kinney, Gregg) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Shell USA, Inc. (Kinney, Gregg) Modified on 12/26/2023 (jle). |
Filing 6 STRICKEN- Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Shell USA, Inc.. (Kinney, Gregg) Modified on 12/26/2023 (jle). |
Filing 5 STRICKEN- NOTICE of Appearance by Gregg A. Kinney on behalf of Shell USA, Inc. (Kinney, Gregg) Modified on 12/26/2023 (jle). |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Orders 347 and 367. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 23-cv-3920-GCS. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 1/3/2024. (jle) |
Filing 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by 3M Company. (Rottenberg, Daniel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Isaac Rottenberg on behalf of 3M Company (Rottenberg, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Madison County, case number 2023LA001639 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5258436), filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rottenberg, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.