Zang v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
| James Zang |
| Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc. |
| Randi Ellis |
| 3:2023pq00678 |
| February 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by James Zang. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC waiver sent on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Neal, Jennifer) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by James Zang. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. waiver sent on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Neal, Jennifer) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by James Zang. Syngenta AG waiver sent on 3/8/2023, answer due 5/8/2023. (Neal, Jennifer) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 23-pq-678-NJR. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (kare) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5010258.), filed by James Zang.(Neal, Jennifer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
