Davis-Brone v. Syngenta Ag et al
Patricia J. Davis-Brone |
Syngenta Ag, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Does 1 through 60 |
Randi Ellis |
3:2023pq01211 |
April 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
Nancy J Rosenstengel |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia J. Davis-Brone. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. served on 5/11/2023, answer due 6/1/2023. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Patricia J. Davis-Brone. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC served on 5/9/2023, answer due 5/30/2023. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 5 Summonses Issued as to Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta Ag, and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Originals mailed to counsel for service. (csb) |
Filing 4 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 23-pq-1211-NJR. (jlrr) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Allen Smith, Jr on behalf of Patricia J. Davis-Brone (Smith, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AILSDC-5049539.), filed by Patricia J. Davis-Brone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keyes, Madison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.