FCB Banks v. USA et al
| FCB Banks |
| Johnny L. Knapp, II, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America |
| John Doe |
| 3:2024cv00075 |
| January 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Staci M Yandle |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 RESPONSE to #14 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim Response to Defenses filed by FCB Banks. (Stine, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against FCB Banks, Johnny L. Knapp, II, John Doe by United States of America.(Parke, Kimberly) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge Staci M. Yandle for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 3:24-cv-00075-SMY. (djw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (djw) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Parke, Kimberly) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE to INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE striking pleading: #9 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. Your signature was absent from the form. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Please refile completed document. Another form is attached to this notice. Please note that, pursuant to the Courts prior Order, the deadline for submitting this form is 2/8/2024. (aza) |
| Filing 9 STRICKEN - CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Parke, Kimberly) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Stine, Kevin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: All parties were directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, All parties shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 2/8/2024 (aza) |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by Internal Revenue Service. Internal Revenue Service shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 3/5/2024.Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/19/2024. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 5 EXHIBIT by Internal Revenue Service. Certified State Court Record. (Parke, Kimberly) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Internal Revenue Service. (Parke, Kimberly) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF MODIFICATION re #1 Complaint.Incorrect event selected. Select the event that most closely matches the document being filed. For this document, the correct event is "Notice of Removal" under the heading "Initial Pleadings and Service > Complaints and Other Initiating Documents". Docket text modified to reflect the correct document. No further action required by the filer. (aza)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Orders 347 and 367. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:24-cv-00075-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 1/31/2024 (aza) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Removal, #3 Summons and Complaint Served on SG, #4 Summons and Complaint Served on AUSA)(Parke, Kimberly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
