Thomas v. Stryker Corporation
| Charles Thomas |
| Stryker Corporation |
| 3:2024cv00137 |
| January 19, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Reona J Daly |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Docket Annotation: Case transferred from Illinois Southern has been opened in District of Massachusetts as case 1:24-cv-10573, filed 03/07/2024. (jlrr) |
| Filing 9 Docket Annotation - Case electronically transferred to the District of Massachusetts. (clw) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: Charles Thomas and Stryker Corporation were directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, Charles Thomas and Stryker Corporation shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 2/20/2024 (adh) |
| Filing 8 Conditional Transfer Order (CTO 74) as assigned by JPML and approved by Tiffaney D. Pete |
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Agreed) filed by Stryker Corporation. Stryker Corporation to answer or otherwise respodn to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before 2/26/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly on 1/26/2024. (lmo)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Agreed) by Stryker Corporation. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Reona J. Daly pursuant to Administrative Orders 347 and 367. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:24-cv-137-RJD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 2/9/2024 (adh) Modified on 1/19/2024 (adh). |
| Filing 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Stryker Corporation. (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by W. Jason Rankin on behalf of Stryker Corporation (Rankin, W.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Madison County, IL, case number 2023LA001681 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5288252), filed by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rankin, W.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thomas v. Stryker Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Thomas | |
| Represented By: | Ronald A. Roth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stryker Corporation | |
| Represented By: | W. Jason Rankin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
