Barnes v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Robert Barnes
Defendant: Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2024cv00226
Filed: January 31, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: J Phil Gilbert
Referring Judge: Gilbert C Sison
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2024 Filing 11 Docket Annotation - Case transferred from Illinois Southern has been opened in Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF NextGen 1.7.1.1 as case 1:24-cv-02008, filed 03/08/2024. (clw)
March 8, 2024 Filing 10 Docket Annotation - Case transferred to Northern District of Illinois per Order at Doc 9. (clw)
March 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO OTHER DISTRICT. The Court GRANTS Barnes's motion to transfer (Doc. 8), TRANSFERS this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois and DISCHARGES the Order to Show Cause (Doc. 7). Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 3/7/2024. (jdh)
March 6, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Transfer Case by Robert Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Suggestions in Support)(Emison, Brett)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. This matter comes before the Court for case management purposes. The Court notes that the plaintiff is a resident of Chicago, in the Northern District of Illinois. Defendant AngioDynamics, Inc. is a citizen of Delaware and New York, and defendant Navilyst Medical, Inc. is a citizen of Delaware and Massachusetts. The surgeries in which the allegedly defective product was implanted and subsequently removed occurred in Chicago, Illinois, which is within the Northern District of Illinois. There is no indication that this case has any connection to the Southern District of Illinois other than the fact that the defendants do business here, and there is no indication that the plaintiff's alleged injuries had anything to do with the defendants' doing business in this district. This, and the fact that the plaintiff's complaint is captioned "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS," leads the Court to doubt whether this case belongs in the Southern District of Illinois. For this reason, the Court ORDERS the plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE on or before March 8, 2024, why the Court should not transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). The defendants shall have seven days from the plaintiff's response to file a reply. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 2/16/2024. (tlp)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
February 15, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge J. Phil Gilbert for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 24-CV-226-JPG. (clw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
February 15, 2024 Filing 5 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Emison, Brett)
January 31, 2024 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Angiodynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc.. Originals mailed to Attorney Brett Emison. (aza)
January 31, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Orders 347 and 367. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Robert Barnes. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:24-cv-00226-GCS. Consent due by 2/21/2024 (aza)
January 31, 2024 Filing 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Robert Barnes. (Emison, Brett)
January 31, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Angiodynamics, Inc., Navilyst Medical, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5298599.), filed by Robert Barnes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Angiodynamics, #3 Summons for Navilyst Medical)(Emison, Brett)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Barnes
Represented By: Brett A. Emison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Angiodynamics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?