Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Aujua S. Lewis |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSAOGC |
| 3:2024cv00466 |
| February 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEFING SCHEDULE: Defendant's brief due within 30 days after filing of plaintiff's brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 4/19/2024. (csb)
|
| Filing 10 SUBMISSION OF TRANSCRIPT of Administrative Record. filed by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Attachments: #1 Court Transcript Index, #2 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Non Disability Related Development, #6 Disability Related Development, #7 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Medical Records Part 2)(Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 3:24-cv-466-MAB. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (adh)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 8 FINAL CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE. |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathan E. Wyatt on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Wyatt, Nathan) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Young, Kelsey) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Aujua S. Lewis to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Aujua S. Lewis on 2/20/2024. Consent due by 3/12/2024 (clw) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Commencement of Action and Judge Assignment. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty assigned. An electronic copy of the Complaint is attached. All future documents must bear case number 24-CV-466-MAB. This notice suffices for service under Supplemental Rule 3 as it provides a means of electronic access to the complaint to the SSAOGC and the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois. Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (clw) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelsey Young on behalf of Aujua S. Lewis (Young, Kelsey) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aujua S. Lewis. (Young, Kelsey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Aujua S. Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Young, Kelsey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
