Phillips v. Wills
Edward S. Phillips |
Warden Anthony Hills and Anthony Wills |
3:2024cv00467 |
February 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
David W Dugan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Letter to Illinois Attorney General constituting service. (tjk) |
Filing 3 ORDER FOR THE SERVICE OF PROCESS upon Respondent. The Court FINDS the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) survives a preliminary review. Respondent is DIRECTED to file a Response by May 15, 2024. Petitioner shall then have until June 14, 2024, to file a Reply. Consistent with footnote 1, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to correct the docket to reflect that Respondent is Warden Anthony Wills. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/15/2024. (jnh) |
Set/Reset Deadlines as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Responses due by 5/15/2024. (adh) |
Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge David W. Dugan assigned. All future documents must bear case number 24-467-DWD. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. (jaj) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AILSDC-5316749.), filed by Edward S. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Whitney, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.