Viral DRM, LLC v. Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc.
Viral DRM, LLC |
Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. |
3:2024cv00471 |
February 21, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
J Phil Gilbert |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 CJRA TRACK B assigned: A Final Pretrial Conference is scheduled for 6/10/2025 at 9:00 AM with a Jury Trial date of 6/23/2025 at 9:00 AM in Benton Courthouse before Judge J. Phil Gilbert. Parties are to submit a Joint Report regarding Proposed Scheduling and Discovery Order within 28 days of the entry of this filing. Scheduling/Discovery and Settlement Conferences will NOT be set for hearing unless requested by the parties or deemed necessary by the Court. Joint Proposed Discovery due by 5/14/2024. (tag) |
Filing 18 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Judge J. Phil Gilbert on 4/16/2024. (tag) |
Filing 17 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc..(Gutierrez, Robert) |
Filing 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc.. (Cate, Matthew) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Cate on behalf of defendant Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Gutierrez on behalf of defendant Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. (kdw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Defendant Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. by Attorney Matthew Stephen Lee Cate $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5361339 by on behalf of Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc.. (Cate, Matthew) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Defendant Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. by Attorney Robert S. Gutierrez $200 fee paid,receipt number AILSDC-5361338 by on behalf of Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc.. (Gutierrez, Robert) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CASE ASSIGNMENT/REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, this case will remain with the assigned J. Phil Gilbert. This Notice does not alter any prior referrals of motions or matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1-3). (csb)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
Filing 10 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 9 NOTICE: Viral DRM, LLC was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, Viral DRM, LLC shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 3/22/2024 (clw) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Viral DRM, LLC. Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. served on 2/29/2024, answer due 3/21/2024. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 7 AO 121-Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Copyright mailed (aca) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc.. Original mailed to Craig Sanders for service. (aca) |
Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Viral DRM, LLC to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Viral DRM, LLC on 2/22/2024. Consent due by 3/14/2024 (aca) |
Filing 4 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge J. Phil Gilbert assigned. All future documents must bear case number 24-cv-471-JPG. (aca) |
Filing 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Viral DRM, LLC. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 2 Summons Requested. (Sanders, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5317178.), filed by Viral DRM, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Video, #2 Exhibit Infringing Use of Video, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanders, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Viral DRM, LLC v. Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Viral DRM, LLC | |
Represented By: | Craig B Sanders |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jansen Chevrolet Co., Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert S. Gutierrez |
Represented By: | Matthew Stephen Lee Cate |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.