Crowell v. Comerica Bank
| Gloston Crowell |
| Comerica Bank |
| 3:2024cv00583 |
| February 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Gilbert C Sison |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER Regarding #11 Notice of Settlement and Request to Stay: Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting that the Court stay this matter pending finalization of settlement paperwork. Plaintiff indicates that the parties have resolved all claims in this matter but require additional time to effectuate the settlement. The Court construes the pleading as a request for a 60-day Order. In light of the pending settlement of this case, the request for entry of a 60-day Order is GRANTED. The undersigned DIRECTS the Clerk of Court, 60 days after this Order is docketed, to ENTER JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs, unless otherwise provided in the settlement documents. If the parties fail to finalize the settlement within the 60-day period, they may -- before that period expires -- move to postpone entry of judgment. Due to the settlement, the Court CANCELS all settings herein. Responses due by 6/10/2024. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/10/2024. (dmw2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement and Request to Stay all Deadlines by Gloston Crowell (Smith, Larry) Modified on 4/5/2024 (tkm). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TERMINATING JUDGE ASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, and a request for reassignment having been received, this case, in its entirety, is hereby reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan for further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison no longer assigned to the case. All future documents must bear case number 24-583-DWD. (tkm)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Smith, Larry) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Marco on behalf of Gloston Crowell (Marco, David) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Angie Robertson on behalf of Gloston Crowell (Robertson, Angie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary Elizabeth Philipps on behalf of Gloston Crowell (Philipps, Mary) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David J. Philipps on behalf of Gloston Crowell (Philipps, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Comerica Bank. Original summons mailed to Attorney Smith. (tkm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gilbert C. Sison pursuant to Administrative Orders 347 and 367. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order Nos. 347 and 367, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Gloston Crowell. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/documents/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 24-583-GCS. Consent due by 3/20/2024 (tkm) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry P. Smith on behalf of Gloston Crowell (Smith, Larry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Comerica Bank ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5325001.), filed by Gloston Crowell. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Smith, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crowell v. Comerica Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gloston Crowell | |
| Represented By: | Larry P. Smith |
| Represented By: | David M. Marco |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Philipps |
| Represented By: | Angie Robertson |
| Represented By: | David J. Philipps |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Comerica Bank | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
