White v. Robbins et al
| Bradley White |
| Brien O'Brien, Thomas M O'Shaughnessy, Bryan Robbins, Tracy W Resch, Anika Ervin, Lisa McMechan and Charles C Hall |
| 3:2024cv02683 |
| December 23, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| David W Dugan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jle) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #13 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. Your signature was absent from the form, and it fails to list each party that is consenting or not consenting to a magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Please refile completed document. Another form is attached to this notice. Please note that, pursuant to the Courts prior Order, the deadline for submitting this form was 1/28/2025. (jle) |
| Filing 13 STRICKEN- CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jle) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bradley White. (jle) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Recruitment of Counsel by Bradley White. (jle) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #9 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. It fails to list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Another form is attached to this Notice. The form should be re-filed as soon as possible. The form should specifically list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (jdc) |
| Filing 9 STRICKEN - CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jdc) Modified on 1/21/2025 (jdc). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking #7 Consent/Non-Consent to US Magistrate Judge. The Clerks Office received your Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form. The form is incomplete. It fails to list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. Therefore, the pleading is STRICKEN. Another form is attached to this Notice. The form should be re-filed as soon as possible. The form should specifically list each party that is consenting or not consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (jle) |
| Filing 7 STRICKEN- CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (jle) Modified on 1/21/2025 (jle). |
| Filing 6 NOTICE: Bradley White was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 386, Bradley White shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 1/21/2025 (tkm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Bradley White to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 386, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/sites/ilsd/files/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Bradley White on 1/7/2025. Consent due by 1/28/2025 (jlrr) |
| Filing 4 Case reassigned to Judge David W. Dugan. Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty no longer assigned to the case. Case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Beatty in error. All future pleadings shall bear case number 24-cv-2683-DWD. (jlrr) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order 386. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 386, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: Bradley White. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/sites/ilsd/files/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 24-CV-2683-MAB. Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. Consent due by 1/13/2025 (clw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. (clw). |
| Filing 2 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Central; Case Number 3:24-cv-03356. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| TEXT ORDER entered by US Magistrate Judge Karen McNaught on 12/20/2024: Upon review of the plaintiff's complaint #1 in this action, it appears that the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois is a more appropriate and convenient venue for further litigation of this matter. The events at issue appear to have taken place within Cumberland County, Illinois, and all the parties appear to reside therein. Therefore, consistent with 28 U.S.C. Sections 1404 and 1391, this Court exercises its sua sponte authority and orders TRANSFER of this case to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois.(SB) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 12/23/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Bradley White.(SB) [Transferred from Illinois Central on 12/23/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
