Weaver v. Syngenta AG et al
| Ana Weaver |
| Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Does 1 through 60 inclusive |
| Randi Ellis |
| 3:2024pq00095 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ana Weaver. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC served on 1/30/2024, answer due 2/20/2024. (Keyes, Madison) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ana Weaver. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. served on 2/2/2024, answer due 2/23/2024. (Keyes, Madison) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Chevron U.S.A. Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. Originals sent to counsel for service. (clw) |
| Filing 4 Summons Requested. (Keyes, Madison) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Allen Smith, Jr on behalf of Ana Weaver (Smith, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 24-PQ-95-NJR. (clw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5282374.), filed by Ana Weaver. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keyes, Madison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
