Coughlan v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
| Eamonn Paul Coughlan |
| Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG |
| Randi Ellis |
| 3:2024pq01781 |
| July 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Nancy J Rosenstengel |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE STRIKING ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS striking 3 MDL-Member Case Opened,. Filed in error. (clw)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 3 STRICKEN - MEMBER CASE(S) OPENED: original court file received from ILSD: 24-PQ-1777-NJR (Hall v. Syngenta AG et al), 24-PQ-1782-NJR (Elzner v. Syngenta AG et al), 24-PQ-1779-NJR (Rotunno v. Syngenta AG et al), 24-PQ-1780-NJR (Schultze v. Syngenta AG et al), 24-PQ-1781-NJR (Coughlan v. Syngenta AG et al). (clw) Modified on 7/26/2024 (clw). |
| Filing 2 Notice of Judge Assignment. Chief Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel assigned. All future documents must bear case number 24-PQ-1781-NJR. (clw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5445989.), filed by Eamonn Paul Coughlan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Martin, Ben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
