Carter v. Kulich et al
Plaintiff: Shaquan Carter
Defendant: Terri Wingerter
Case Number: 3:2026cv00040
Filed: January 15, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: David W Dugan
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2026 Filing 39 NOTICE by Shaquan Carter (kare)
June 26, 2026 Filing 38 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed Terri Wingerter waiver sent on 6/25/2026, answer due 8/24/2026. (mado)
June 25, 2026 Filing 37 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Defendant Wingerter on 6/25/2026. Waiver of Service due by 7/27/2026. (mado)
June 25, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 36 Order for Service of Process: Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute (Doc. 35) is GRANTED in part. The Clerk of Court shall replace John Doe with Terri Wingerter, and shall serve Wingerter consistent with the Order for Service of Process (Doc. 17). By contrast, Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute (Doc. 35) is DENIED in part and he may not add two additional partiesgallery officers Ryan Ramsey and Ethan Tellor. The problem with trying to add Ramsey and Tellor by the Motion to Substitute is that Plaintiff makes new factual allegations about these two that are not in the amended complaint, and piecemeal amendments are not acceptable. If Plaintiff would like to add Ramsey and Tellor, he should file an amended complaint that repeats his allegations against Wingerter and adds the details he wishes to assert against Ramsey and Tellor. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE the Warden of Menard because the Warden has satisfied the task of helping to identify John Doe. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 6/25/2026. (kgk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 18, 2026 Filing 35 MOTION to Substitute Party by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
June 16, 2026 Filing 34 RESPONSE to #30 Notice (Other) filed by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
June 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER: Plaintiff's Fourth Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 31) is DENIED. This case concerns conditions of confinement that Plaintiff attributes to a sole John Doe defendant in June and July of 2025. Other claims in the case against officers Kulich and Young were previously dismissed as insufficient to state a claim (Doc. 17). In the present motion for injunctive relief, Plaintiff complains that Defendant Kulich has recently harassed him and has exhibited retaliatory conduct. As the Court has previously explained in relation to the Third Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, injunctive relief will not be granted if it is not related to the claims or parties in the lawsuit. Here, the only claim concerns conditions of confinement in June and July of 2025, and does not involve Kulich. Thus, Plaintiff's request for a prison transfer on the premise of retaliation by Kulich is not an appropriate basis for relief in this case. Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 31) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 6/15/2026. (kgk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Status (Doc. 29) is GRANTED by issuance of this Order. Plaintiff indicates that John Doe identification is ongoing, and he asks about next steps. As the Court previously explained, the Warden of Menard was directed to provide information to Plaintiff about John Doe, and the Warden has now confirmed as of June 3, 2026, that he provided this information. Therefore, Plaintiff is now responsible for filing a motion to substitute to give the Court the name of the John Doe "placement officer" who he claims violated his rights on June 23, 2025 and July 10, 2025. Plaintiff must file his Motion by June 25, 2026, failing which this case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 6/15/2026. (kgk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
June 12, 2026 Filing 31 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
June 3, 2026 Filing 30 NOTICE by Warden Menard Correctional Center re 28 Order,, (Notice of Compliance) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Edick, Cole)
May 26, 2026 Filing 29 MOTION for Status by Shaquan Carter. (jaj)
May 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER: On April 10, 2026, the Court allowed Plaintiff to proceed against John Doe placement officer and it directed him to file identifying information. Plaintiff complied (Doc. 22), and the Warden shall now have until June 3, 2026, to provide responsive information and to file a Notice of Compliance. Plaintiff shall have until June 25, 2026, to file a Motion to Substitute or to specify additional steps that can be taken to identify John Doe, failing which John Doe may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 5/5/2026. (kgk)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
April 30, 2026 Filing 27 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Edick, Cole)
April 29, 2026 Filing 26 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare)
April 27, 2026 Filing 25 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Warden Menard Correctional Center to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 428, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Warden Menard Correctional Center on 4/27/2026. Consent due by 5/18/2026. (jle)
April 24, 2026 Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Cole Edick on behalf of Warden Menard Correctional Center (Edick, Cole)
April 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER denying #21 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/14/2026. (kgk)
April 13, 2026 Filing 22 NOTICE with descriptive info about John Doe Defendants by Shaquan Carter re #17 Order for Service of Process - Prisoner,,,, Terminate Motions,,, (kare) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/15/2026: #1 Certificate of Service) (jdc).
April 13, 2026 Filing 21 MOTION for EMERGENCY Preliminary Injunction by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/13/2026. (jle)
April 10, 2026 Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Warden Menard Correctional Center waiver sent on 4/10/2026, answer due 6/9/2026. (mado)
April 10, 2026 Filing 18 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Defendant Warden of Menard on 4/10/2026. Waiver of Service due by 5/11/2026. (mado)
April 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Order for Service of Process: Claim 2 may proceed against John Doe Placement officer and the Clerk of Court shall ADD the Warden of Menard to this suit and shall serve the Warden in official capacity to help identify John Doe. Plaintiff shall have 21 days to file a notice with information about John Doe, such as his physical appearance, nicknames, shift assignment, etc.. If Plaintiff does not file a notice, this case may be dismissed. Claims 1 and 3 against Defendants Kulich and Young are dismissed as insufficient to state a claim and the Clerk shall TERMINATE Kulich and Young. The Clerk shall enter the standard HIPAA order in this case. Finally, Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 16) is DENIED for reasons explained in this Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 4/10/2026. (kgk)
March 27, 2026 Filing 16 MOTION for Emergency Preliminary Injunction by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
March 23, 2026 Filing 15 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against John Doe, Justin Kulich, Heather Young filed by Shaquan Carter.(jaj)
February 27, 2026 Filing 14 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 18 received, receipt number 21638 (clw)
February 23, 2026 Filing 13 Initial Prisoner Filing Fee: $ 3.12 received, receipt number 21399 (clw)
February 20, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER to File Amended Pleading: Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed without prejudice as insufficient to state a claim and because it improperly joins unrelated claims. Plaintiff shall have 30 days, until March 23, 2026, to file an amended complaint and the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a civil rights template. Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 10) is DENIED, and his Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. 11) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 2/20/2026. (kgk)
February 18, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
February 10, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION for Emergency Preliminary Injunction Relief by Shaquan Carter. (tkm)
February 9, 2026 Filing 9 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (kare)
February 5, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE: Plaintiff was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 408, Plaintiff shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 2/12/2026 (jaj)
January 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") (Doc. 2). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $36.03. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to forward the initial partial filing fee from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of Court upon receipt of this Order. Plaintiff shall make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding month's income credited to Plaintiff's prison trust fund account (including all deposits to the inmate account from any source) until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of this Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee is paid. In addition, Plaintiff shall note that the filing fees for multiple cases cumulate. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 436 (7th Cir. 1997), overruled in part on other grounds by Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025 (7th Cir. 2000); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626 (7th Cir. 2000). A prisoner who files one suit must remit 20% of his monthly income to the Clerk of the Court until his fees have been paid; a prisoner who files a second suit or an appeal must remit 40%; and so on. Newlin, 123 F.3d at 436. "Five suits or appeals mean that the prisoner's entire monthly income must be turned over to the court until the fees have been paid." Id. Payments shall be mailed to: Clerk of the Court, United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, Illinois 62201. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the Trust Fund Officer at Menard Correctional Center upon entry of this Order. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 1/21/2026. (mado)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
January 20, 2026 Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (mado)
January 16, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP") in this case (Doc. 2) but failed to provide the necessary prisoner trust fund account information as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). Therefore, Plaintiff is ORDERED to provide the Clerk of Court with the attached Certification completed by the Trust Fund Officer at his facility and a copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the period July 15, 2025, thru January 15, 2026, no later than March 2, 2026. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this case for failure to comply with an order of the Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). See generally Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of this Order and the Certification form to the Trust Fund Officer at Menard Correctional Center. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 1/16/2026. (mado)
January 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER: The Court has received your complaint and your motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Your case number is 26-cv-00040-DWD. The following is some information you should know regarding the initial stages of your lawsuit. After your filing fee status is determined, the Court will review your complaint to identify legally sufficient claims and defendants and dismiss any legally insufficient claims. See: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915A. The Court will conduct this review within the next 60 days and inform you of the findings in a Merit Review Order. No other action will be taken in your case during this time, absent extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, you do not need to submit any evidence, argument, motions, or other documents. If you filed a motion for recruitment of counsel along with your complaint, it will not be considered until the merit review is complete. Please note that any motion for recruitment of counsel must include evidence of your own efforts to find counsel, such as a list of the attorneys you contacted and copies of letters you sent or received. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647, 654-55 (7th Cir. 2007). If you do not receive a Merit Review Order within the next 60 days, you may file a motion requesting the status of your case. In the event your claim(s) survive the merit review, further information and instruction will be provided to you at that time. In addition, several administrative matters warrant mention. Any communication directed to the Court should be in the form of a motion or other pleading and not a letter. All mail should be sent to: Clerk's Office, U.S. District Court, 750 Missouri Avenue, East St. Louis, IL 62201. Finally, you are advised that if your address changes, you must notify the Court within fourteen days of the change by filing a Notice of Change of Address. Failure to do so could result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge David W. Dugan on 1/15/2026. (kare)
January 15, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 408, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 1/15/2026. Consent due by 2/5/2026 (kare)
January 15, 2026 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Shaquan Carter. (kare)
January 15, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Shaquan Carter.(kare)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Kulich et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaquan Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terri Wingerter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?