Clark et al v. Goodman et al
| Dennis Clark and Janet Clark |
| Brenny Specialized, Inc. and Nathan Ryan Goodman |
| Brenny Specialized, Inc. and Nathan Ryan Goodman |
| Dennis Clark |
| 3:2026cv00365 |
| March 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Mark A Beatty |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 ANSWER to #13 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Dennis Clark.(Bleyer, Joseph) |
| Filing 22 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dennis Clark. (Bleyer, Joseph) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph A. Bleyer on behalf of Dennis Clark (Bleyer, Joseph) |
Filing 20
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Scheduling Conference set for 6/18/2026 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty via ZOOM. The parties will receive a ZOOM invitation via email from the Court. Joint Report of the Parties due seven days before the conference and shall be submitted via email to [email protected]. The parties are reminded that the proposed discovery and dispositive motions deadlines must be in compliance with the requirements set forth in this Court's form order. See also SDIL-LR 7.1(f) and Timetable. The Parties are instructed to use the correct form for the Joint Report of the Parties which can be found attached to this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 4/23/2026. (Attachments: #1 Joint Report of Parties Form)(jmj)
|
Filing 19
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 4/23/2026. (jmj)
|
| Filing 18 CJRA TRACK C assigned: Presumptive Jury Trial Month is set for October 2027 in East St. Louis Courthouse before Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 4/23/2026. (jmj) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE: All parties have consented to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty is ASSIGNED to conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. All future documents must bear case number 3:26-cv-00365-MAB. Any District Judge previously assigned will no longer be assigned to this case. (jdc)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 16 FINAL CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Caraway, Matthew) Modified on 4/23/2026 (jdc). (Main Document 16 replaced on 4/23/2026) (jdc). |
| Filing 15 NOTICE: Dennis Clark and Janet Clark was directed to file the attached form regarding consenting or declining to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction. The time for doing so has now passed, and the Court has not received the form. As required by Administrative Order No. 428, Dennis Clark and Janet Clark shall return the form within 7 days or face possible sanctions. Consent due by 4/29/2026. (jle) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/NON-CONSENT TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE - sealed pending receipt from all parties. (Droz, Karen) (Main Document 14 replaced on 4/23/2026) (jdc). |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint of Plaintiffs, Affirmative Defense, COUNTERCLAIM against Dennis Clark by Nathan Ryan Goodman.(Hefflefinger, Matthew) |
Filing 12
ORDER GRANTING #10 First Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Defendants request an additional 14 days to file their answer or other responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' complaint. Plaintiffs have not yet filed a response to Defendants' motion, however, the Court finds it appropriate to rule on the motion without Plaintiffs' input given the customary nature of the request and the brevity of the requested extension. For good cause shown, Defendants' deadline to file their answer or other responsive pleading is EXTENDED to April 17, 2026. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty on 4/7/2026. (klh2)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED.
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew S. Hefflefinger on behalf of All Defendants (Hefflefinger, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiffs' Complaint by All Defendants. (Droz, Karen) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ACTION re #4 Notice of Appearance filed by Janet Clark, Dennis Clark. Because the required Disclosure Statement was not filed with the attached, this matter is being submitted to the presiding judge for further action. A copy of this Court's form Disclosure Statement can be found at #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/forms-0. (jdc)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Karen M. Droz on behalf of Brenny Specialized, Inc., Nathan Goodman (Droz, Karen) |
| Filing 7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Nathan Goodman. (Droz, Karen) |
| Filing 6 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Brenny Specialized, Inc.. (Droz, Karen) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Phillip G. Palmer, Jr on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Palmer, Phillip) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew H Caraway on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Caraway, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ACTION re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Nathan Goodman, Brenny Specialized, Inc. Because the required Disclosure Statement was not filed with the attached, this matter is being submitted to the presiding judge for further action. A copy of this Court's form Disclosure Statement can be found at #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/forms-0. (jdc)THIS TEXT ENTRY IS AN ORDER OF THE COURT. NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION WILL BE MAILED. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF INITIAL ASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE: This case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Mark A. Beatty pursuant to Administrative Order 428. The parties are advised that their consent is required if the assigned Magistrate Judge is to conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and final entry of judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73. As set forth in Administrative Order No. 428, each party will be required to file a Notice and Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form indicating consent or non-consent to the jurisdiction of the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties do not consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction, the case will be randomly assigned to a district judge for all further proceedings and the parties cannot later consent to reassignment of the case to a magistrate judge. The parties are further advised that they are free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences. Within 21 days of this Notice, the following party or parties must file the attached form indicating consent to proceed before the assigned Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent: All Parties. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/sites/ilsd/files/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. All future documents must bear case number 3:26-cv-00365-MAB. Refer to Civil/Removal Case Processing Requirements, found on the ILSD website, for further service information. Consent due by 4/21/2026 (jdc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Franklin County, IL, case number 2026LA7 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5873662), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Appearance on behalf of Karen Droz for defendants)(Hefflefinger, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.