Bick et al v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
| Alvin Bick, Daniel Ford and Steven Strader |
| R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc and Walgreen Co. |
| 3:2026cv01150 |
| August 31, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 Disclosure Statement by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company identifying Corporate Parent Reynolds American Inc., Corporate Parent British American Tobacco, p.l.c., Other Affiliate The Capital Group Companies, Inc. for R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. (Walker, Jihan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jihan E. Walker on behalf of R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (Walker, Jihan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Madison County, Illinois, case number 2026LA001065 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AILSDC-5987191), filed by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit #2, #3 Exhibit Exhibit #3, #4 Exhibit Exhibit #4, #5 Exhibit Exhibit #5, #6 Exhibit Exhibit #6, #7 Exhibit Exhibit #7, #8 Exhibit Exhibit #8, #9 Exhibit Exhibit #9, #10 Exhibit Exhibit #10, #11 Exhibit State Filings, #12 Exhibit State Docket)(Walker, Jihan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.