Henry v. Russell et al
| Cecil Henry |
| Prosecutor Russell, Sheriff Parsons, Sheriff Brown and Bill Brooks |
| 3:2026cv01166 |
| September 4, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois |
| Stephen P McGlynn |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM CLERK Instructing Plaintiff to file Notice and Consent to Proceed Before A Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form: Pursuant to Administrative Order No. 447, within 21 days of this Notice, you must file the attached form indicating your consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge or an affirmative declination to consent. A link regarding the magistrate judges in this district is attached for your convenience: #https://www.ilsd.uscourts.gov/sites/ilsd/files/BenefitsofConsent.pdf. Consent/Non-Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form sent to Plaintiff on 9/4/2026. Consent due by 9/25/2026 (kare) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Judge Assignment. Judge Stephen P. McGlynn assigned. All future documents must bear case number 26-1166-SPM. Refer to the pro se litigant guide, found on the ILSD website, for further information. (kare) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cecil Henry. (kare) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Cecil Henry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kare) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/4/2026) (tkm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.