Thompson v. Memorial Hospital of Carbondale et al
Plaintiff: Archie D. Thompson
Defendant: Memorial Hospital of Carbondale
Case Number: 4:2004cv04162
Filed: August 25, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
Office: Benton Office
County: Jackson
Presiding Judge: G. Patrick Murphy
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 155 ORDER granting 151 Motion to Accept Remittitur and for Addition of Interest Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961 brought by Plaintiff Archie D. Thompson. Signed by Judge G. Patrick Murphy on 5/2/2011. (jhs)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Memorial Hospital of Carbondale et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Archie D. Thompson
Represented By: A. Courtney Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Memorial Hospital of Carbondale
Represented By: Shari R. Rhode
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?