United States of America v. Sturdevant et al
United States of America |
Stacy Sturdevant and AIMCO Properties, LP |
2:2007cv02233 |
June 1, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Wyandotte |
Kathryn H. Vratil |
David J. Waxse |
Civil Rights: Accomodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Fair Housing Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 433 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER finding that plaintiff's counsel should be required to pay NHPMN's reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion to compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 12/30/09. (mh) |
Filing 137 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER sustaining 77 United States' Application for Entry of Default. Pursuant to Rule 55(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., the Clerk shall enter default against Stacy Sturdevant. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 5/1/09. (ag) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 34 Plaintiff United States' Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint; granting 41 Joint Motion to Reset Dates in the Court's March 26, 2008 Amended Scheduling Order (Third Request); denying as moot 36 Plaintiff United St ates' Motion to Reset Dates in the Court's March 26, 2008 Amended Scheduling Order; and denying as moot 37 Plaintiff United States' Motion to Reset Dates in the Court's March 26, 2008 Amended Scheduling Order (Second Request). See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 9/11/2008. (sr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.