Stephenson et al v. Honeywell International, Inc. et al
||Armour D Stephenson, III, Patrick G Stephenson and Michael D Rahn
||Honeywell International, Inc., Goodrich Corporation, Dukes, Inc, Rourke Aviation, Inc, Foster's Propeller Service, Inc, Aircraft Accessories of Oklahoma, Inc, Richard M Abernathy and Kim Lee
||October 16, 2007
||Kansas District Court
||Kansas City Office
||XX US, Outside State
||John W. Lungstrum
||David J. Waxse
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 2, 2010
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 176 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on plaintiffs' strick liability and warranty claims - and defendant is awarded judgment on those claims; denying 178 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony by plaintiffs' expert Donald Sommer; denying 180 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on defendant's attempt to compare the fault of the pilot; granting in part and denying in part 182 Motion to Exclude expert testimony by defendant's experts Gregory Feith, John Maris, and Allen Parmet - The motion is granted with respect to Dr. Parmets opinions concerning the pilots ethanol level, medication side effects unrelated to susceptibility to spatial disorientation, rogue pilot behavior, and the credibility of the pilots spouse, and such testimony will be excluded at trial; the motion to exclude is denied in all other respects. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 04/02/2010. (ses)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?