Fanning et al v. Sitton Motor Lines, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Tammy Fanning, Paul Fanning, Ashley Fanning and A.F.
Defendant: Sitton Motor Lines, Inc. and James F. Duke
Case Number: 2:2008cv02464
Filed: September 25, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: P.I.: Other Office
County: Shawnee
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Presiding Judge: David J. Waxse
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 94 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 67 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - The plaintiff administrators survival claims for damages for pain and suffering and pre-impact mental anguish are hereby dismissed; and granting in p art and denying in part 68 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to the Appropriate Heirs-at-Law - The motion is granted insofar as the defendants seek to preclude the plaintiffs from asserting claims for N.F. directly as an heir, but is denied insofar as the defendants seek to preclude the plaintiffs from using N.F.s presence in the household to establish Ms. Fannings own damages. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 02/16/2010. (ses)
June 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER denying without prejudice 27 Motion for Protective Order. See Order for details and deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 6/8/2009. (sr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fanning et al v. Sitton Motor Lines, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Fanning
Represented By: Martin M. Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Fanning
Represented By: Martin M. Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Fanning
Represented By: Martin M. Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: A.F.
Represented By: Martin M. Meyers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sitton Motor Lines, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James F. Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?