Jaax v. Chrysler Financial, LLC et al
Philip N. Jaax |
Chrysler Financial, LLC and Daimler Chrysler Financial Services, LLC |
2:2008cv02490 |
October 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Labor: Fair Standards Office |
XX US, Outside State |
James P. O'Hara |
Kathryn H. Vratil |
None |
Federal Question |
29:201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 136 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Plaintiff's 112 Objections to Report and Recommendation is overruled in part. In order to proceed with a claim to rescind the settlement agreement, on or before December 18, 2009, plaintiff must tender to defendant a ca shiers check or money order in the amount of $5,037.44. The 110 Motion to Escalate Case for Review Upon Chief Judge and Motion to Expedite are withdrawn. Plaintiff's 125 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document 110 and 111 is susta ined. Plaintiff's 128 Motion for Appropriate Relief From the court Due to Technical Failures is overruled as moot. The 134 Motion for Extension of Time to Perform an Act is Sustained. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 12/11/2009. (ck) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying request of plaintiff for an extension of the deadline for the parties to conduct their Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference. Instead, the scheduling conference set for December 30, 2008, at 10:00 a.m., will be held in person before the Hon. James P. O'Hara, in Courtroom 236. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 12/17/2009.(kg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.