Daniles v. Cessna Aircraft Company
Plaintiff: Kathryn Daniles
Defendant: Cessna Aircraft Company
Case Number: 2:2008cv02625
Filed: December 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Sedgwick
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Presiding Judge: Gerald L. Rushfelt
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 8 Motion to Transfer Case. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 4/30/2009. (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (jw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniles v. Cessna Aircraft Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Daniles
Represented By: Lawrence W. Williamson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cessna Aircraft Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?