McDermed et al v. Hill et al
| Diane L. McDermed and Michelle N. Beavers |
| Brian R. Thompson, Gerald Raab, Mike Osborn, Kansas Association of Public Employees, Inc., American Federation of Teachers and Jon Carl Hill |
| 2:2009cv02004 |
| January 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Kansas City Office |
| Shawnee |
| Karen M. Humphreys |
| Eric F. Melgren |
| Both |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 139 KAPE's uncontested Motion to Compel - Plaintiffs shall provide the requested information or execute the requested employment information release on or before 4/18/2011; denying 146 Plaintiff's Motion fo r Leave to File Response Out of Time; and granting 149 KAPE's Motion to Strike. The clerk of court shall take appropriate steps to strike plaintiffs' response [Doc. 147]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 4/11/2011. (sj)
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 44 KAPE's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 94 KAPE's Motion to Strike; granting 103 Defendants' Motion to Strike; denying 105 Plaintiffs' Motion to Continue; denying 26 AFT' s Motion to Dismiss. The parties shall confer and submit a revised planning report by October 25, 2010. Documents 60-16 and 102 are stricken from the record. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen M. Humphreys on 9/27/10. (sj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
