D&K Ventures, LLC v. MGC, LLC et al
| D&K Ventures, LLC |
| MGC, LLC, Hurst Consulting, LLC, Austin Hurst and Zachary Hurst |
| 2:2009cv02084 |
| February 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| John W. Lungstrum |
| David J. Waxse |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 15 Defendant's Motion to Strike. Plaintiff is granted leave to file, on or before August 21, 2009, a second amended complaint. If plaintiff does not file such a complaint, defendants are granted leave to file, on or before September 8, 2009, a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 08/12/2009. (ses)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 9 Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of the complaint. The motion is granted with respect to defendants argument that plaintiff did not plead those two counts with sufficient particularity pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b); the claims are dismissed, but plaintiff is granted leave to amend those allegations on or before June 8, 2009. The motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 05/27/2009. (ses)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
