Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company v. Rodriguez
Plaintiff: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Defendant: Jesus Rodriguez
Case Number: 2:2009cv02100
Filed: February 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Insurance Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Eric F. Melgren
Presiding Judge: James P. O'Hara
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss; granting 19 Motion for Leave to File; denying as moot 27 Motion to Dismiss; granting 31 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Eric F. Melgren on 11/2/09. (alm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company v. Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Represented By: Maureen A. Walterbach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jesus Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?