Cheema v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Justia Dockets & Filings Tenth Circuit Kansas District Court Cheema v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Cheema v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of

Plaintiff:	Stacey Cheema
Defendant:	Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Case Number:	2:2009cv02162
Filed:	April 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Wyandotte
Presiding Judge:	Gerald B. Cohn
Presiding Judge:	John W. Lungstrum
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 24, 2009	Filing 23 ORDER granting 21 Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment. This case is REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). The court further grants 20 Motion to S trike Erroneous Administrative Record and to submit a Corrected Administrative Record. The initial administrative record (filed as attachments to Doc. 9) is hereby stricken from the record and the Clerk of the Court shall delete or destroy all copies of the previously filed administrative transcript, whether in electronic, CD, paper, or any other form. Upon deletion and destruction of the initial administrative record (filed as attachments to Doc. 9), the Clerk of the Court shall enter a text entry notice of such destruction upon the docket of the Court. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/24/2009. (ses)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 24, 2009

Filing 23 ORDER granting 21 Defendant's Motion to Reverse and Remand and for Entry of Final Judgment. This case is REVERSED AND REMANDED to the Defendant pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. Section 405(g). The court further grants 20 Motion to S trike Erroneous Administrative Record and to submit a Corrected Administrative Record. The initial administrative record (filed as attachments to Doc. 9) is hereby stricken from the record and the Clerk of the Court shall delete or destroy all copies of the previously filed administrative transcript, whether in electronic, CD, paper, or any other form. Upon deletion and destruction of the initial administrative record (filed as attachments to Doc. 9), the Clerk of the Court shall enter a text entry notice of such destruction upon the docket of the Court. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 11/24/2009. (ses)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cheema v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Cheema
Represented By:	Nicholas D. Purifoy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?