Kelly v. Wilson et al
| Lawrence L. Kelly |
| Myrtle Wilson, Bryan Greene and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development |
| 2:2009cv02188 |
| April 14, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Kansas |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations Office |
| Johnson |
| Kathryn H. Vratil |
| David J. Waxse |
| Plaintiff |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 05:7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 47 Response to 45 Order on Motion for Reconsideration. The case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 12/8/2010.Mailed to pro se party Lawrence L. Kelly by certified mail ; Certified Tracking Number: 7009 1510 0002 0380 9738.(ck)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 32 Motion for Reconsideration. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the Court has now resolved the issue of sovereign immunity adversely to plaintiff, plaintiff show cause in writing on or before October 18, 2010 why the Court should not convert the order of dismissal without prejudice to an order of dismissal with prejudice Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on October 4, 2010. (mlm)
|
|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER overruling 8 Motion for Default Judgment. On or before October 13, 2009, plaintiff shall file proof of service of defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on September 29, 2009.(mlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
