KRS Corporation LLC v. QSR Automations, Inc.
Plaintiff: KRS Corporation LLC
Defendant: QSR Automations, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2009cv02312
Filed: June 12, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Kansas
Office: Kansas City Office
County: Allen
Presiding Judge: Carlos Murguia
Presiding Judge: James P. O'Hara
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 9/22/09. Case stayed pending further disposition by the Western District of Kentucky. (yh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: KRS Corporation LLC v. QSR Automations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KRS Corporation LLC
Represented By: Rebecca S. Stroder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QSR Automations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?