Cardozo v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
Alan Cardozo |
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Home Depot Supply, Inc., The and Home Depot, Inc., The |
2:2010cv02011 |
January 7, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Kansas |
Kansas City Office |
Johnson |
John W. Lungstrum |
Gerald L. Rushfelt |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 58 Motion for Reconsideration. This case remains set for trial beginning on 07/07/2011 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 5/5/2011. (ses) |
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 53 Motion to Enforce Settlement. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 3/7/2011. (ses) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 44 Motion for Reconsideration of the Courts 43 Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 10/28/2010. (mg) |
Filing 43 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 15 Motion to Dismiss and plaintiff's claims against defendants HD Supply, Inc. and The Home Depot, Inc. are dismissed; granting 21 Motion to bar experts and plaintiff is barred from offering opinion or expert ev idence in this case; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs and plaintiff is ordered to pay costs to Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. in the amount of $100.00 on or before August 2, 2010. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 07/13/2010. (ses) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kansas District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.